LexisNexis Home

About Quicklaw
What's New
QuickFind with Auto Link
Customer Support

Contact Customer Support

Technical Help

Search Help

Training Information

FAQs and QUICKTIPS

User Materials

Add Me to Your Mailing List
Obtain Account
Academic Accounts
Recent Decisions


QL Home > Customer Service > Search Help - Searching for a Specific Case

Quicklaw™ Customer Service

Search Help - Searching for a Specific Case

QUICKTIPS
QUICKRULES: Searching for Cases by Title
Civil Law Examples
Criminal Law Examples

QUICKTIPS

Tip One: If you have a citation (e.g., 101 D.L.R. (4th) 621 or [1993] S.C.J. No. 36) see Finding a Case with its Citation to retrieve the case without selecting a database or running a search.
Tip Two: If you have the registry number or action number for the case,
use it as the search term.

QUICKRULES: Searching for Cases by Title

  • Begin your search with the restriction @2. The @2 instructs Quicklaw to search only in the Title field.
  • Follow the @2 with your search terms with an AND connector between them.
  • Choose unique names from the title as your search words.
  • Choose at least one word from each party's name.
  • Avoid common words (e.g., company, limited, board, Canada).
  • Avoid words that may be abbreviated.

Please contact Customer Service for personal assistance.

Civil Law Examples

Example One Search for the Supreme Court of Canada decision
Hercules Managements Ltd. v. Ernst & Young.
  Database: SCC (Supreme Court of Canada)
Search: @2 hercules & ernst
Example Two Search for the British Columbia Supreme Court decision
Topnotch Developments Ltd. v. Welldone Ventures Canada Inc.
  Database: BCJ (British Columbia Judgments)
Search: @2 topnotch & welldone

Please contact Customer Service for personal assistance.

Criminal Law Examples

The most efficient way to search for criminal law cases is to use only the defendant's name and to avoid common terms (e.g., Regina, R., Her Majesty, The Queen).

Example One Search for the 1997 Supreme Court of Canada decision R. v. Greyeyes.
  Database: SCJ (Supreme Court Judgments)
Search: @2 greyeyes
Example Two Search for the 1996 Ontario Court of Appeal decision Regina v. Smith.
  As this is a common name, include some information about the topic of the case. Regina v. Smith discusses the use of multiple investigative techniques to assess impairment.
  Database: ORP (Ontario Reports Plus)
Search: multiple /1 investigative & @2 smith
  Note: Begin the search with the topic terms. This instructs Quicklaw to search for the topic terms anywhere in the document. If you begin the search with @2, then Quicklaw will also search in the Title field for multiple investigative.

Please contact Customer Service for personal assistance.

Top

Legal Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Copyright 2006 LexisNexis Canada Inc. All rights reserved.